Tracked question

What models does Amp’s new ChatGPT-linked subscription actually include?

Movement at this check

Stable since last check

Nothing material moved in this check.

Direction shift
0/100
Agreement
0 pts vs previous check

Agreement over time

90/100
2026-07-28: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-08-04: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The new answer provides more specific details about how the GPT-5.6 variants (Terra and Sol) map to different Amp usage modes (Low, Medium, High) and clarifies that non-OpenAI routes like Claude Fable 5 in Ultra mode are excluded. 2026-08-18: 67/100 · The breakdown of model assignments per routing mode changed significantly. Low mode changed from GPT-5.6 Terra to GLM-5.2 + GPT-5.6 Sol; High mode oracle changed from GPT-5.6 Sol to Claude Fable 5; Review changed from GPT-5.6 Terra to GPT-5.5; and specific routes for Puck/Search and Librarian were added while general routing details were updated. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · The exact model routing breakdown substantially changed: Low main agent shifted from GLM-5.2 to GPT-5.6 Terra, High oracle shifted from Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.6 Sol, and Code review shifted from GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 Terra. Additionally, the new answer specifies that Low/Med/High workflows are covered, while Ultra mode uses Claude Fable and Amp credits. 2026-09-01: 90/100 · The response was reformatted from a table to bullet points with slightly streamlined wording, but all core facts, covered models, modes, and exclusions remain identical. View full chart
You are viewing a historical version. Return to current consensus

Sources

Position Map

Where the models stand

Each row is one part of the answer. The cards show the distinct positions; the model chips show who supports each one.

0/100 Direction Shift · Stable
Shared conclusion

Amp’s ChatGPT-linked subscription covers these OpenAI models for the specified modes:

Shared position

Supports this conclusion

  • DeepSeek
  • Gemini
  • OpenAI
Shared conclusion

GPT-5.6 Terra — Low mode, thread reading, and code review.

Shared position

Supports this conclusion

  • DeepSeek
  • Gemini
  • OpenAI
Shared conclusion

GPT-5.6 Sol — Medium mode, plus both the main agent and oracle in High mode.

Shared position

Supports this conclusion

  • DeepSeek
  • Gemini
  • OpenAI
Shared conclusion

This is mode-based routing, not access to every model Amp offers.

Shared position

Supports this conclusion

  • DeepSeek
  • OpenAI
See how each model moved across checks
Model position movement by watch date
ModelJul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 01
OpenAI
Gemini
Grok — — —
DeepSeek — — — — —

Cite this answer

Ask your own question

Consensus Watch

Run history

90/100 latest agreement

Since tracking began: The old consensus detailed specific internal GPT-5.6 variants and excluded model providers like GLM-5.2 and Claude Fable 5, as well as Amp plan restrictions (Megawatt vs Gigawatt). The new consensus streamlines this to focus broadly on GPT-5.6 access without detailing the specific excluded models or plan tiers.

View the full agreement chart

Agreement over time

How strongly the models support the same claims. Every point links to its run below.

100 50 0 2026-07-28: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-08-04: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The new answer provides more specific details about how the GPT-5.6 variants (Terra and Sol) map to different Amp usage modes (Low, Medium, High) and clarifies that non-OpenAI routes like Claude Fable 5 in Ultra mode are excluded. 2026-08-18: 67/100 · The breakdown of model assignments per routing mode changed significantly. Low mode changed from GPT-5.6 Terra to GLM-5.2 + GPT-5.6 Sol; High mode oracle changed from GPT-5.6 Sol to Claude Fable 5; Review changed from GPT-5.6 Terra to GPT-5.5; and specific routes for Puck/Search and Librarian were added while general routing details were updated. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · The exact model routing breakdown substantially changed: Low main agent shifted from GLM-5.2 to GPT-5.6 Terra, High oracle shifted from Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.6 Sol, and Code review shifted from GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 Terra. Additionally, the new answer specifies that Low/Med/High workflows are covered, while Ultra mode uses Claude Fable and Amp credits. 2026-09-01: 90/100 · The response was reformatted from a table to bullet points with slightly streamlined wording, but all core facts, covered models, modes, and exclusions remain identical. 2026-07-28 2026-09-01

Checks

Newest first. Open any saved result to read the full consensus from that date.

  1. Meaningful change
    90/100 agreement

    The response was reformatted from a table to bullet points with slightly streamlined wording, but all core facts, covered models, modes, and exclusions remain identical.

    Open this consensus
  2. Meaningful change
    75/100 agreement

    The exact model routing breakdown substantially changed: Low main agent shifted from GLM-5.2 to GPT-5.6 Terra, High oracle shifted from Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.6 Sol, and Code review shifted from GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 Terra. Additionally, the new answer specifies that Low/Med/High workflows are covered, while Ultra mode uses Claude Fable and Amp credits.

    Open this consensus
  3. Meaningful change
    67/100 agreement

    The breakdown of model assignments per routing mode changed significantly. Low mode changed from GPT-5.6 Terra to GLM-5.2 + GPT-5.6 Sol; High mode oracle changed from GPT-5.6 Sol to Claude Fable 5; Review changed from GPT-5.6 Terra to GPT-5.5; and specific routes for Puck/Search and Librarian were added while general routing details were updated.

    Open this consensus
  4. Meaningful change
    64/100 agreement

    The new answer provides more specific details about how the GPT-5.6 variants (Terra and Sol) map to different Amp usage modes (Low, Medium, High) and clarifies that non-OpenAI routes like Claude Fable 5 in Ultra mode are excluded.

    Open this consensus
  5. Stable
    90/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  6. Stable
    90/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus