consens.io
Product Watches Topics Questions Benchmark Ask your own question

Tracked question

Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?

Current consensus 2026-09-01 Active
Runs Weekly on Tuesday at 09:00 (Europe/Berlin) Last 2026-09-01 09:17 Europe/Berlin Next 2026-09-08 09:00 Europe/Berlin

Latest movement

Stable since last check

The answer has held through 3 checks.

Direction shift
0/100
Agreement
+9 pts vs previous check

Agreement over time

84/100
2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement View full chart
84 /100
agreement
  • 3 AI models
  • 1 contradiction
  • 22 sources
  • 7 checks since 21 Jul 2026
Consensus gpt-5.6-luna
Models consulted
  • OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
  • Google Gemini Gemini 3.7 Flash
  • DeepSeek DeepSeek V4 Flash

Current consensus

Yes. As of July 20, 2026, GitHub Code Quality is a paid, standalone product and is not included with a GitHub Copilot subscription.githubgithub

Key points:

  • License fee: For private repositories, Code Quality is billed at $10 per active committer per month. An active committer is generally someone who pushed to an enabled repository within the preceding 90 days; each person is counted once per organization.githubgithub
  • AI usage: AI-assisted analysis and fixes use the organization’s shared GitHub AI Credits pool and may generate additional usage charges. A Copilot seat is not generally required for Code Quality’s AI features, although particular features such as assigning work to the Copilot cloud agent can require Copilot.githubgithub
  • Actions usage: Code Quality’s CodeQL-based scans run through GitHub Actions and consume Actions minutes, unless self-hosted runners are used.github
  • Separate from Copilot code review: Paid Copilot plans may include Copilot code review, but that is a different product/feature from GitHub Code Quality.github

Therefore, if Code Quality was enabled during its preview period, an organization should review its billing settings: charges began when the product reached general availability, and disabling Code Quality is necessary to stop ongoing license charges.

Differences

1 notable difference (1 contradiction) across 3 models.

contradiction · minor detail

The exact date of General Availability / paid product launch.

GA and billing started on July 20, 2026.

DeepSeek

“as of **July 20, 2026**, GitHub Code Quality is a **paid, standalone product**”

GA and separate billing started on September 1, 2026.

OpenAI

“As of **September 1, 2026, GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product**”

How to verify: Check GitHub's changelog/documentation for the exact GA release date of GitHub Code Quality.

Best answerDeepSeek

Follow this question

This page is re-checked weekly. Get one e-mail when the AI consensus shifts — no account needed.

Double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · your address is only used for these updates.

Sources

  1. 1 GitHub Code Quality billing - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  2. 2 GitHub Code Quality - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  3. 3 About GitHub Copilot code review - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  4. 4 github.com
  5. 5 github.com
  6. 6 Sobre a Qualidade do Código do GitHub - GitHub Enterprise Cloud Docs - Skip to main content docs.github.com
  7. 7 GitHub Code Qualityコストの表示と管理 - GitHubドキュメント - Skip to main content docs.github.com
  8. 8 Da oggi, GitHub Code Quality diventa disponibile per tutti, ma a pagamento - Da oggi, GitHub Code Quality diventa disponibile per tutti, ma a pagamento digitalworlditalia.it
  9. 9 GitHub Code Quality: $10 per committer from 20 July 2026 ecorpit.com
  10. 10 GitHub Code Quality Billing Starts Today: What 10,000 Enterprise Teams Must Audit Now - GitHub Code Quality Billing Starts Today: What 10,000 Enterprise Teams Must Audit Now techtimes.com
  11. 11 GitHub Code Quality、7月20日に一般提供され有料サービスに codezine.jp
  12. 12 GitHub Code Quality kkgithub.com
  13. 13 GitHub、「Code Quality」ライセンス費用見積もり機能をプレビュー公開 codezine.jp
  14. 14 [QGIS-Developer] anyone else get a vague github shakedown notice? is this about qgis? lists.osgeo.org
  15. 15 github.blog
  16. 16 devops.com
  17. 17 github.com
  18. 18 GitHub Code Quality is now generally available - GitHub Changelog github.blog
  19. 19 GitHub Code Quality generally available July 20, 2026 - GitHub Changelog github.blog
  20. 20 GitHub Code Quality Moves to General Availability, Bringing New Costs and Capabilities - DevOps.com devops.com
  21. 21 GitHub Code Quality 一般提供開始(2026年7月20日) github.blog
  22. 22 GitHub Code Quality is now generally available 🚢 · community · Discussion #201460 - Skip to content github.com

Position Map

Where the models stand

Each row is one part of the answer. The cards show the distinct positions; the model chips show who supports each one.

0/100 Direction Shift · Stable
Models disagree

The exact date of General Availability / paid product launch.

Position 1

GA and billing started on July 20, 2026.

  • DeepSeek
Position 2

GA and separate billing started on September 1, 2026.

  • OpenAI
See how each model moved across checks
Model position movement by watch date
ModelJul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 01
OpenAI
Gemini —
Grok — —
DeepSeek — — — — — —
Same positionChanged position

Cite this answer

consens.io. (2026-09-01). Consensus answer to "Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?". Models consulted: OpenAI: gpt-5.6-luna, Google Gemini: gemini-3.7-flash, DeepSeek: deepseek-v4-flash. Consensus model: gpt-5.6-luna. Sources: https://docs.github.com/en/billing/concepts/product-billing/github-code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-quality/code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/code-review?utm_source=openai, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEkSnhFphbefWGIKS2DG5eRb0OcIOxU00aaSH6icoW2lhUHCG-XiQxA0yQydU7UMvXMKmFBD3FOgEvRkISFY6rC3w4kSs2mqcE4EIFtlMhfZTewn8XoTjfOWW4x0J-jyy20B61amDCfy-g_Jq3bocqTFOPe2E4xoLSr0YT--KPKekoZYE-v, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFdW1K-VY86UIpufGTtC130QOnC0IT7DCnVnp2mTZ82Pnde6e0-bC0iJ4Ie7Ik9m3VP5fiWUgwDl14kn_ca1VFodNsoTR5RHCV1J0W65eKhmlaTAX3Loyz994iBXNhlUo4Xh8Xgd3re5g==, https://docs.github.com/pt/enterprise-cloud@latest/code-security/code-quality/concepts/about-code-quality#1, https://docs.github.com/ja/code-security/how-tos/maintain-quality-code/view-and-manage-cost#1, https://www.digitalworlditalia.it/sviluppo-software/da-oggi-github-code-quality-diventa-disponibile-per-tutti-ma-a-pagamento-180470#1, https://ecorpit.com/github-code-quality-ga-billing-cost-audit-2026/, https://www.techtimes.com/articles/321001/20260720/github-code-quality-billing-starts-today-what-10000-enterprise-teams-must-audit-now.htm#discussion#1, https://codezine.jp/news/detail/24593, https://kkgithub.com/features/code-quality, https://codezine.jp/news/detail/28947, https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-July/068430.html, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG0NtMBIsDZwNoMhJpSCADW2D-7ywSi5dJdL_E2bSj1Ezn4YDc0uK2xaDBPdUKnuH9uh0W3VMGu0jA8A21LkXqHHau7QJuS5nmk6FdQTTpdUzWdSh3HQR_SE2u2GqUocAV3C0F3LlbGuaFq1D4-xJOgVSgJ4tjNMg4GtQwI0MYF8oob8FBtHPhpy3WnAUbr, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQELDpDPwktM17HgrVRofaxEHO17ePKy9W7Qd1f9OZVdrKgeplmSAWdKpDKUAtyizEcnmvz9B0kI2rR0XN3liebKqLYP9hMnwOpHPFTju7zTa3Ql_4OCd4vaiM5ffN8yf9pQybuT3QNQxG9wsyEPfjl4bxvGSDXxSNC66Z0V_AUkrYNqH-cdz-XqD8WrXwsJ-zePM_hVgwdkUwF2_QmQ6ms=, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGMmaqiQOVCvsJZeLWFCb3kGTFhRjqZXhixM37pk0_pLYshiYzhOdn7tSDGehnDPLsGtnKoN9uUy_BE41Ql4k55KnYseiLt81rnhHwJtOVxuzHVdWGhPOxpfQJcAeYI, https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-20-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/?utm_source=chatgpt.com, https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-16-github-code-quality-generally-available-july-20-2026/#sidebar, https://devops.com/github-code-quality-moves-to-general-availability-bringing-new-costs-and-capabilities/?utm_source=jmc_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DO_jmc, https://github.blog/jp/2026-06-17-github-code-quality-generally-available-july-20-2026/, https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/201460#1 Retrieved from https://www.consens.io/s/is-github-code-quality-now-a-paid-product-for-copilot-users-7rGuShYDM829QiGE

Ask your own question

Consensus Watch

Run history

84/100 latest agreement

Since tracking began: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality costs $10/active committer/month and is not included with Copilot). The new version adds minor details regarding private repositories, preview billing transition advice, and distinction from Copilot code review.

View the full agreement chart

Agreement over time

How strongly the models support the same claims. Every point links to its run below.

100 50 0 2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement 2026-07-21 2026-09-01

Checks

Newest first. Open any saved result to read the full consensus from that date.

  1. 2026-09-01 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  2. 2026-08-25 Stable
    75/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  3. 2026-08-18 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories.

    Open this consensus
  4. 2026-08-11 Meaningful change
    64/100 agreement

    The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting.

    Open this consensus
  5. 2026-08-04 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion.

    Open this consensus
  6. 2026-07-28 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged.

    Open this consensus
  7. 2026-07-21 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

Related questions

  • Is Claude Code or OpenAI Codex more token-efficient? 5 models compared
  • Is Claude Code or Codex better at debugging? 5 models compared
  • Is Codex or Claude Code more reliable for automated tests? 5 models compared
  • Is Cursor or Claude Code better value for daily coding? 5 models compared

About this tracked question

3 AI models answered this question independently on 2026-09-01. A judge from a different model family then cross-checked the answers, scored how far they agree and flagged where they differ. The question is re-checked weekly — this is check 7 since 21 Jul 2026, and every earlier version stays on this page.

AI models can make mistakes – verify important information against the sources above.

How consensus works →

Thanks – this page has been reported for review.

© 2026 consens.io
App Topics Questions Model pulse Benchmark Model guide How consensus works About Terms Privacy Imprint