consens.io
Product Watches Topics Questions Benchmark Ask your own question

Tracked question

Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?

Historical consensus 2026-08-25 Active
Runs Weekly on Tuesday at 09:00 (Europe/Berlin) Last 2026-09-01 09:17 Europe/Berlin Next 2026-09-08 09:00 Europe/Berlin

Movement at this check

Stable since last check

The answer has held through 2 checks.

Direction shift
0/100
Agreement
-15 pts vs previous check, within the range of the recent checks

Agreement over time

84/100
2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement View full chart
You are viewing a historical version. Return to current consensus
75 /100
agreement
  • 2 AI models
  • 0 contradictions
  • 10 sources
Consensus gpt-5.6-luna
Models consulted
  • OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
  • Google Gemini Gemini 3.7 Flash

Consensus at this check

Yes. GitHub Code Quality is now a separately paid product and is not included with a Copilot subscription. It became generally available on July 20, 2026, after its public preview.github

For private repositories, pricing includes:

  • $10 per active committer per month—an active committer is generally someone who pushed to a Code-Quality-enabled repository within the past 90 days. Committers are counted once across the organization, and bot accounts are excluded.github
  • Additional usage charges for AI-powered features through GitHub AI Credits.
  • GitHub Actions usage charges for analysis workflows, unless you use self-hosted runners.github

Public repositories currently have no per-committer Code Quality charge, though AI-credit and Actions usage may still apply.github Some optional remediation features, such as delegating work to Copilot, may also require a Copilot license.github

In short: Copilot does not waive the Code Quality fee; Code Quality is billed separately.

Differences

The 2 models broadly agree – no notable differences found.

Best answerOpenAI

Follow this question

This page is re-checked weekly. Get one e-mail when the AI consensus shifts — no account needed.

Double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · your address is only used for these updates.

Sources

  1. 1 GitHub Code Quality is now generally available - GitHub Changelog github.blog
  2. 2 GitHub Code Quality - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  3. 3 GitHub Code Quality · GitHub github.com
  4. 4 github.com
  5. 5 github.com
  6. 6 github.com
  7. 7 github.com
  8. 8 reddit.com
  9. 9 github.blog
  10. 10 devops.com

Position Map

Where the models stand

Each row is one part of the answer. The cards show the distinct positions; the model chips show who supports each one.

0/100 Direction Shift · Stable
Models disagree

The exact date of General Availability / paid product launch.

Position 1

GA and billing started on July 20, 2026.

  • DeepSeek
Position 2

GA and separate billing started on September 1, 2026.

  • OpenAI
See how each model moved across checks
Model position movement by watch date
ModelJul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 01
OpenAI
Gemini —
Grok — —
DeepSeek — — — — — —
Same positionChanged position

Cite this answer

consens.io. (2026-08-25). Consensus answer to "Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?". Models consulted: OpenAI: gpt-5.6-luna, Google Gemini: gemini-3.7-flash. Consensus model: gpt-5.6-luna. Sources: https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-20-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-quality/code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://github.com/features/code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFM_PkmurQKnrgENlx-pawlpm3y-WRBbviEwmAWWDoP02K7eCcFtSY1ZUpF_Y0R1w--fWRG8E9SFqHvfdt6BsfzalEsS4sr3q_4U36y4gvLHOOM2rpAjHgrYP0kW_c8, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEpVBDe0TTJEvI_ke2tsKEetn0UIS_PB0Da2Fm6miiMDs5BL0S1hqs6y2HIaeA7lFL3DPNg-_Vv4ZGaPbvc-ANRLBE2puqjWQRE7NbB1QT93akK6m-MVtII-0bCSUFIxuiGbuvKcZdCN2Tp9-YtAMptMfnh164II9PgSppRUPFfIv0_A64Bod1ClY73ygpUAqzsGqoJBKy8WNGxlkoO, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFl1_F561BB9UqAzao4SEc8HbcPy18mCz78QQumWw8rW4pgwlOWv0lYWnWZWA4MvpgV32WnpwOkbyEyXrTfA0d1zTaw7JaWpr2_VUHaEgZcTxd-Ac5jIS2hqWRi9rsTeIvHiU-mfXxYFA==, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGRR6MggGTlOSWdiOxTUl18n4tTgPHG8uwH3vH6LRVl6jKmeHqwplU4sHsl_IIKxKcDipT_A0iDJNNdzoXKlh2W_EAtMd0C2c3b4h28nUjjVaHyjDl-HeH6sGWuwdX-1JvIUfQpoIsuqbFGzhcLmTcOMD6rZEvMmHZV0nETp8bC1B8lFpK6ayza_sC0bF-gITtK, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEoBQwNfA3rT8holqL0PCJrWKcLN4ZVaKJRACFB1StkAX-r4qIbwJvw00GZFkkFdJHxgiHXj8nvxPXL292chHdLP0ijqe_d5RfuFJbuFb7lk4iQqS0BsQztDqhh0H7fAC3KZ1ebvTekrVYL-xazQx1lPF_mwVJNl0s_WSvC0Rx6C__kUX6I9B1Kbzq3OA7U5o0=, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEI04kUWsZWF7WeApkhOGn6fHusuh35V5XHm6HXi9UX8Y3aKyjxbCZopXC_EjCdhbTUrumzsDC6RTW6723sK-lpDQIjv0i1OajpXf6zhhgcLIU80uyj0TqCjPEpQyxJTMHQGZ5E2_l-kH2sSKbmvWA-_7-TpymByZ7QXNaRpM0mG_1zkn0c_dYCyHGa6ke5QeqQ_n46, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQErKW2y-OcsT059gsQZ2MpMUuYe72UzUPF8kNHkJPWQU6MdOTn-FfCfNOEY7zmpKvq11Bud5Rs-GuZ-UOeCSMvGPAYFFuA8nJixtWqWgeDyWviB4a19s8NElNnhqmOlRdpc8Z8flzHbqWnpALEkvhwHscxDoPXOURuBfuU9NyMkBdjlZiImClSnRVoYTndRvGIdSr_ERJ9Hao-59CKe9Is= Retrieved from https://www.consens.io/s/is-github-code-quality-now-a-paid-product-for-copilot-users-7rGuShYDM829QiGE?version=bc5f7d95794278a62945013f

Ask your own question

Consensus Watch

Run history

84/100 latest agreement

Since tracking began: Added clarifying details regarding public repository pricing (no per-committer charge), bot exclusions, and unique committer counting across an organization, while maintaining the same core conclusion and pricing model.

View the full agreement chart

Agreement over time

How strongly the models support the same claims. Every point links to its run below.

100 50 0 2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement 2026-07-21 2026-09-01

Checks

Newest first. Open any saved result to read the full consensus from that date.

  1. 2026-09-01 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  2. 2026-08-25 Stable
    75/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  3. 2026-08-18 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories.

    Open this consensus
  4. 2026-08-11 Meaningful change
    64/100 agreement

    The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting.

    Open this consensus
  5. 2026-08-04 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion.

    Open this consensus
  6. 2026-07-28 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged.

    Open this consensus
  7. 2026-07-21 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

Related questions

  • Is Claude Code or OpenAI Codex more token-efficient? 5 models compared
  • Is Claude Code or Codex better at debugging? 5 models compared
  • Is Codex or Claude Code more reliable for automated tests? 5 models compared
  • Is Cursor or Claude Code better value for daily coding? 5 models compared

About this tracked question

2 AI models answered this question independently on 2026-08-25. A judge from a different model family then cross-checked the answers, scored how far they agree and flagged where they differ. The question is re-checked weekly, and every earlier version stays on this page.

AI models can make mistakes – verify important information against the sources above.

How consensus works →

Thanks – this page has been reported for review.

© 2026 consens.io
App Topics Questions Model pulse Benchmark Model guide How consensus works About Terms Privacy Imprint