consens.io
Product Watches Topics Questions Benchmark Ask your own question

Tracked question

Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?

Historical consensus 2026-08-11 Active
Runs Weekly on Tuesday at 09:00 (Europe/Berlin) Last 2026-09-01 09:17 Europe/Berlin Next 2026-09-08 09:00 Europe/Berlin

Movement at this check

Changed since last check

The answer itself held, but the models now agree less than in the recent checks (-20 pts). The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting.

Direction shift
0/100
Agreement
-20 pts vs previous check

Agreement over time

84/100
2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement View full chart
You are viewing a historical version. Return to current consensus
64 /100
agreement
  • 3 AI models
  • 1 contradiction
  • 13 sources
Consensus OpenAI GPT-5.4 mini
Models consulted
  • OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
  • Google Gemini Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  • Grok Grok 4.3 · No reasoning

Consensus at this check

Yes. GitHub Code Quality is now a separate paid product rather than a feature included with Copilot.githubgithub

What that means in practice:

  • It has a base charge of $10 per active committer per month for organizations on GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud.githubgithub
  • Copilot does not include the Code Quality per-committer license, so paying for Copilot alone does not cover Code Quality.github
  • Some Code Quality capabilities can still use GitHub AI Credits and GitHub Actions minutes for usage-based billing.github

One nuance: Copilot-related AI features inside Code Quality may not require a Copilot subscription, but the Code Quality product itself is still billed separately.githubgithub

Differences

1 notable difference (1 contradiction) across 3 models.

contradiction · critical

Model B states that GitHub Code Quality is not a paid product specifically for Copilot users, whereas the consensus and other models affirm it is a separate paid product.

GitHub Code Quality is not a paid product specifically for Copilot users

Grok

“No, GitHub Code Quality is not a paid product”

GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product

OpenAI, Gemini

“Yes—but GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product, not an included Copilot benefit.”

How to verify: Verify whether Model B's opening denial conflicts with the consensus that it is a separate paid product.

Best answerOpenAI

Follow this question

This page is re-checked weekly. Get one e-mail when the AI consensus shifts — no account needed.

Double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · your address is only used for these updates.

Sources

  1. 1 GitHub Code Quality is now generally available - GitHub Changelog github.blog
  2. 2 GitHub Code Quality billing - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  3. 3 GitHub Code Quality - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  4. 4 About GitHub Code Quality - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  5. 5 github.com
  6. 6 devops.com
  7. 7 github.com
  8. 8 infoq.com
  9. 9 github.blog
  10. 10 github.com
  11. 11 docs.github.com
  12. 12 github.blog
  13. 13 docs.github.com

Position Map

Where the models stand

Each row is one part of the answer. The cards show the distinct positions; the model chips show who supports each one.

0/100 Direction Shift · Stable
Models disagree

The exact date of General Availability / paid product launch.

Position 1

GA and billing started on July 20, 2026.

  • DeepSeek
Position 2

GA and separate billing started on September 1, 2026.

  • OpenAI
See how each model moved across checks
Model position movement by watch date
ModelJul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 01
OpenAI
Gemini —
Grok — —
DeepSeek — — — — — —
Same positionChanged position

Cite this answer

consens.io. (2026-08-11). Consensus answer to "Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?". Models consulted: OpenAI: gpt-5.6-luna, Google Gemini: gemini-3.5-flash-lite, Grok: grok-4.3-no-reasoning. Consensus model: OpenAI. Sources: https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-20-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/billing/concepts/product-billing/github-code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-quality/code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/about-code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://github.com/features/copilot/plans, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFXJiVc-ZUGYacuKE8pNyPPU6ge83dXG2K7ku3EAmsXQYzbKtzYl8N_IFbVsDSJCDA0t6BwaJGRRbSHpDutkFaBrRk_qd-8npj-O68guek0ZZ6gfbYKyOSkQM5mAKWjhK2Yiq1zwtIbVQY2uISxEBInyZc_NUk2oVMTK1clj2QIHjN65uCeAGMz6QQCtgu61E0WalWMIo9sv9uOWqeen1c=, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEFsQvuD1tGNpnaY9aW0vLc_2KuSzrSuFiPXcQ8M0Ny3pPapMVnIIhwXtLenRqj0RH-YJHikq8TEqxxjNFimlGXD_cdyyQ_Sng6j70V6D4-BFYE98vUGnVROH-lYHsbBZ8DZAZU7Rops1cyhHdVtD0c34BFpg6Qw6JPljh92hLPS4DGu1Vq, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFQeoPYxL--TmALC6wyXj2jRvX11yorRGEp0elyf1QeW64ui5UcJdbHgD3pJryd81-kXsjnlfX4trxYfyXC9opmqCX56DpV-QH_O9wqYp2ITvYDeiu9QV3cNKq6WV7PEx40Pmy7JHQu6eTn22Js, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGztjnaC-sumIC8EljkmHHVaxYMcl4JKBLLklRY3FGbpxmws2SaI-YCLmpI1xG6040Py5p14Fj2HmU9ZP-mDDa6j0WK--Jr3Sip7mCAjwV0nnvpHA8Vf1kvrp4PUF4X60277-uODO5rpzvfLg4n37pp3zhJjWxGQ2077H6BKIQ9YvH61eIO9whDN61fY_lFPbDhSqbnwjo=, https://github.com/features/code-quality, https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-quality/code-quality, https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-16-github-code-quality-generally-available-july-20-2026/, https://docs.github.com/en/billing/concepts/product-billing/github-code-quality Retrieved from https://www.consens.io/s/is-github-code-quality-now-a-paid-product-for-copilot-users-7rGuShYDM829QiGE?version=9ccef44e0c70c13ebcc18ca7

Ask your own question

Consensus Watch

Run history

84/100 latest agreement
View the full agreement chart

Agreement over time

How strongly the models support the same claims. Every point links to its run below.

100 50 0 2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement 2026-07-21 2026-09-01

Checks

Newest first. Open any saved result to read the full consensus from that date.

  1. 2026-09-01 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  2. 2026-08-25 Stable
    75/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  3. 2026-08-18 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories.

    Open this consensus
  4. 2026-08-11 Meaningful change
    64/100 agreement

    The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting.

    Open this consensus
  5. 2026-08-04 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion.

    Open this consensus
  6. 2026-07-28 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged.

    Open this consensus
  7. 2026-07-21 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

Related questions

  • Is Claude Code or OpenAI Codex more token-efficient? 5 models compared
  • Is Claude Code or Codex better at debugging? 5 models compared
  • Is Codex or Claude Code more reliable for automated tests? 5 models compared
  • Is Cursor or Claude Code better value for daily coding? 5 models compared

About this tracked question

3 AI models answered this question independently on 2026-08-11. A judge from a different model family then cross-checked the answers, scored how far they agree and flagged where they differ. The question is re-checked weekly, and every earlier version stays on this page.

AI models can make mistakes – verify important information against the sources above.

How consensus works →

Thanks – this page has been reported for review.

© 2026 consens.io
App Topics Questions Model pulse Benchmark Model guide How consensus works About Terms Privacy Imprint