consens.io
Product Watches Topics Questions Benchmark Ask your own question

Tracked question

Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?

Historical consensus 2026-08-04 Active
Runs Weekly on Tuesday at 09:00 (Europe/Berlin) Last 2026-09-01 09:17 Europe/Berlin Next 2026-09-08 09:00 Europe/Berlin

Movement at this check

Stable since last check

The wording moved, the conclusion held: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion.

Direction shift
—
Agreement
-6 pts vs previous check

Agreement over time

84/100
2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement View full chart
You are viewing a historical version. Return to current consensus
84 /100
agreement
  • 3 AI models
  • 0 contradictions
  • 11 sources
Consensus OpenAI GPT-5.4 mini
Models consulted
  • OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
  • Google Gemini Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  • Grok Grok 4.3 · No reasoning

Consensus at this check

Yes. GitHub Code Quality is now a separate paid product for organizations on GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud; it is not included with Copilot subscriptions.githubgithub

A few practical details matter:

  • Copilot users do not automatically get Code Quality. Code Quality has its own billing and licensing.githubgithub
  • Pricing is generally $10 USD per active committer per month for enabled private repositories, with public repositories charged $0 for that base fee.github
  • There can also be usage-based charges for:
    • GitHub Actions minutes used by CodeQL scans
    • GitHub AI Credits for AI-powered features such as AI-assisted detection and Copilot Autofix.github

So the short answer is: yes, it’s paid now, and Copilot alone doesn’t include it.githubgithub

Differences

1 notable difference across 3 models.

emphasis

Additional details about features, rollout dates, and usage pricing components

Provides extensive details on features, pricing mechanics, and rollout date of July 20, 2026.

Grok, OpenAI

Provides a concise summary of the pricing structure without extra feature details.

Gemini

“The pricing model consists of:”

Best answerOpenAI

Follow this question

This page is re-checked weekly. Get one e-mail when the AI consensus shifts — no account needed.

Double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · your address is only used for these updates.

Sources

  1. 1 GitHub Code Quality is now generally available - GitHub Changelog github.blog
  2. 2 GitHub Code Quality billing - GitHub Docs docs.github.com
  3. 3 GitHub Code Quality · GitHub github.com
  4. 4 github.com
  5. 5 devops.com
  6. 6 reddit.com
  7. 7 github.com
  8. 8 github.blog
  9. 9 github.com
  10. 10 docs.github.com
  11. 11 docs.github.com

Position Map

Where the models stand

Each row is one part of the answer. The cards show the distinct positions; the model chips show who supports each one.

0/100 Direction Shift · Stable
Models disagree

The exact date of General Availability / paid product launch.

Position 1

GA and billing started on July 20, 2026.

  • DeepSeek
Position 2

GA and separate billing started on September 1, 2026.

  • OpenAI
See how each model moved across checks
Model position movement by watch date
ModelJul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 01
OpenAI
Gemini —
Grok — —
DeepSeek — — — — — —
Same positionChanged position

Cite this answer

consens.io. (2026-08-04). Consensus answer to "Is GitHub Code Quality now a paid product for Copilot users?". Models consulted: OpenAI: gpt-5.6-luna, Google Gemini: gemini-3.5-flash-lite, Grok: grok-4.3-no-reasoning. Consensus model: OpenAI. Sources: https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-20-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/?utm_source=openai, https://docs.github.com/en/billing/concepts/product-billing/github-code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://github.com/features/code-quality?utm_source=openai, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEC7cMu2D0Cx1bUlk17CREjRw7n5f3l5vtuSLCMTmG5zFRn3iv_o8vSjI4xUfcYa86DZxbS8h2wUo5zokZmv-1Ih6FBFDYLDzkhdGVWwkon42hEFafzt5YUikuXCwhuyE2BD5jPwSufOmmk6aotcJEBlwU1f_ti6wON91HwYhr7iA2cheGu1IZN-pU6Roc0ab0mU1ZWhRSFb69PvGQO, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFdqztHBINvGmCzmTR3M1LaxWuAeNOlwl2K_HE5z0Sj85-pO0a_exjIKGNExRaFUkOkn2QPNaNiyxRDr4Jspwb22IXMxKMoVUHgyj2A9tP3SPguDeXNbn0rvszeTJ10pDnfwiV60CKaIzhduVz91nQHJY2no_Nzplt0IpxJL0-5uOA1jByO0839hVVkSIcBY21pWCy2a3Nsf4JV9UTbRNs=, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEMlE3XtQxg85I9XTQrmsPgCiM7QHxrMZAyZP08m9cx76ZPUL7gWvPVLwj89HhXoEv7RyD00AgMIQAm5z0K5TSnpk9zsOlE0KmuRyjOels5B0mBR_G9Da76pwfM4_ndvhPBaqMg-8CPF79HZy1yDH9ClHitsRiZRTcm0KL8fZZZJ9njL3agQ1hdEksXpSfazkwWCY6lLhg=, https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH2PrkO97GCZP7GHV3So-ArggQIdCmQjFYnIgw53N1Z1OmB8Maqtg_uH6UV-e35kf1mVfhiiNCJ2eM1HgQekotA6bavVE3oGRlR1nDIeHRGEqD5tgn3BFHtpwVRKffJ, https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-20-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/, https://github.com/features/code-quality, https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-quality/code-quality, https://docs.github.com/en/billing/concepts/product-billing/github-code-quality Retrieved from https://www.consens.io/s/is-github-code-quality-now-a-paid-product-for-copilot-users-7rGuShYDM829QiGE?version=e847ad96806c31fed97bd4ab

Ask your own question

Consensus Watch

Run history

84/100 latest agreement

Since tracking began: The new consensus adds a clarification that public repositories are charged $0 for the base fee, and expands the usage-based charges to explicitly mention AI-assisted detection and Copilot Autofix.

View the full agreement chart

Agreement over time

How strongly the models support the same claims. Every point links to its run below.

100 50 0 2026-07-21: 90/100 · No material movement 2026-07-28: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged. 2026-08-04: 84/100 · Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion. 2026-08-11: 64/100 · The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting. 2026-08-18: 90/100 · Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories. 2026-08-25: 75/100 · No material movement 2026-09-01: 84/100 · No material movement 2026-07-21 2026-09-01

Checks

Newest first. Open any saved result to read the full consensus from that date.

  1. 2026-09-01 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  2. 2026-08-25 Stable
    75/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

    Open this consensus
  3. 2026-08-18 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The core conclusion remains unchanged (GitHub Code Quality is billed separately from Copilot at $10/committer/month), but the new version adds GA date context (July 20, 2026) and specifies $0 pricing for public repositories.

    Open this consensus
  4. 2026-08-11 Meaningful change
    64/100 agreement

    The old and new consensus answers both state that GitHub Code Quality is a separate paid product not included with Copilot, with a base charge of $10 per active committer per month and potential usage-based charges. The differences are purely in wording and formatting.

    Open this consensus
  5. 2026-08-04 Stable
    84/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: The new consensus adds specific plan availability (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and clarifies that AI-powered features use GitHub AI Credits and Actions minutes, refining the pricing details without altering the core conclusion.

    Open this consensus
  6. 2026-07-28 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    Restated, not moved: NEW adds that public repos have $0 base charge (with possible usage fees); OLD omits public/private distinction and includes 2026 date plus specific plan/server availability. Core conclusion (separate paid product, not covered by Copilot) unchanged.

    Open this consensus
  7. 2026-07-21 Stable
    90/100 agreement

    No meaningful movement detected in this check.

Related questions

  • Is Claude Code or OpenAI Codex more token-efficient? 5 models compared
  • Is Claude Code or Codex better at debugging? 5 models compared
  • Is Codex or Claude Code more reliable for automated tests? 5 models compared
  • Is Cursor or Claude Code better value for daily coding? 5 models compared

About this tracked question

3 AI models answered this question independently on 2026-08-04. A judge from a different model family then cross-checked the answers, scored how far they agree and flagged where they differ. The question is re-checked weekly, and every earlier version stays on this page.

AI models can make mistakes – verify important information against the sources above.

How consensus works →

Thanks – this page has been reported for review.

© 2026 consens.io
App Topics Questions Model pulse Benchmark Model guide How consensus works About Terms Privacy Imprint