AI Research & Mathematics

Unsolved Math Problems Solved by AI

Answer from Sep 16See the current answer

Which open math problems has AI actually solved so far?

Sources

Get an email when this answer changes

Only when a check moves the answer. No account needed.

History

Checked 28 times since Jul 25

100 50 0 Jul 25: 90/100 Jul 27: 37/100 Jul 29: 50/100 Jul 30: 58/100 Jul 31: 64/100 Aug 1: 64/100 Aug 2: 64/100 Aug 3: 64/100 Aug 4: 64/100 Aug 5: 84/100 Aug 6: 64/100 Aug 7: 64/100 Aug 8: 64/100 Aug 9: 82/100 Aug 10: 90/100 Aug 11: 22/100 Aug 19: 90/100 Aug 26: 84/100 Sep 2: 97/100 Sep 9: 64/100 Sep 16: 64/100 · the answer changed Sep 23: 39/100 · the answer changed Sep 30: 39/100 Oct 7: 48/100 · the answer changed Oct 14: 11/100 Oct 14: 15/100 Oct 15: 39/100 Oct 22: 64/100 · the answer changed Jul 25 Oct 22
How strongly the models agree, per check. Amber points mark checks that changed the answer.
  1. The answer changed

    The new answer adds the KLS conjecture as a major AI-assisted problem reportedly proved in 2026, supported by a newly surfaced Microsoft Research source. It also names additional specific results from OpenAI’s mathematics release.

    Read this version
  2. 3 checks, no change
  3. The answer changed

    The new answer adds documented AI-generated/formally checked resolutions of open Erdős problems, including a public writeup and broader proof-search results. This strengthens the evidence beyond the standing answer’s framing of outright open-problem solutions as mostly recent claims awaiting broad verification.

    Read this version
  4. Checked, no change
  5. The answer changed

    The consensus shifted from claiming AI has actively resolved major open problems (like Erdős problems, Navier-Stokes, and Fermat's Last Theorem) to a much more cautious stance that AI has only achieved silver-medal Olympiad levels and improved bounds/constructions, while claims of solving famous open problems lack sufficient independent validation.

    Read this version
  6. The answer changed

    The new consensus substantially strengthens the conclusion, asserting that AI has settled major open problems, including a Navier–Stokes result, and resolved numerous Erdős and other conjectures. The old consensus treated such claims as tentative, unverified, and not community-accepted, while affirming only material advances and possible machine-checkable results.

    Shown above
  7. 19 checks, no change
  8. Topic started

    The first answer. Every later check is compared with it.

    Read this version
How the 3 models compared · 1 contradiction

Google Gemini gemini-3.5-flash-lite · DeepSeek deepseek-v4-flash · Grok grok-4.3-no-reasoning

Contradiction · critical

The Navier–Stokes result included a formal Lean verification establishing finite-time singularity.

The result was only a partial, independently unverified analytical solution, with no available formal publication.

DeepSeek

“the solution has not yet been independently verified”

The result was an internal unreleased claim whose proof was not presented as formally verified in Lean.

Gemini

“OpenAI announced that an internal, unreleased reasoning model successfully produced a solution”

The system produced both an analytical proof and a Lean formalization resolving the relevant statements.

Grok

“OpenAI announced an internal system produced both an analytical proof and a Lean formalization”

How to verify: Check OpenAI's primary materials and the Lean files to determine whether the singularity claim was formally verified and which Navier–Stokes statements were established.

Emphasis

AI has resolved a specific Erdős problem numbered 728 involving factorial divisibility and logarithmic gaps.

The highlighted Erdős result is a planar unit-distance conjecture rather than Problem #728.

Gemini

“Erdős Planar Unit Distance Problem Conjectures”

The highlighted Erdős result is an internally reported unit-distance conjecture disproof rather than Problem #728.

Grok

“OpenAI – Disproof of the Erdős unit-distance conjecture (discrete geometry)”

Erdős #728 was formally resolved by Aristotle combined with GPT-5.2 Pro.

DeepSeek

“Resolution of Erdős Problem #728”

How to verify: Double-check the primary Erdős #728 paper and distinguish it from the separate unit-distance result when assessing which specific problem was resolved.

Emphasis

AI-generated formalizations of Fermat’s Last Theorem produced millions of lines of code and tens of thousands of intermediate theorems.

Anthropic's Claude formalized Fermat’s Last Theorem in 11 days, but no exact code or theorem counts are supplied.

DeepSeek

“autonomously produced a formal Lean proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem in 11 days”

The responses focus on other AI breakthroughs and do not report an AI formalization of Fermat’s Last Theorem.

Gemini

“Beyond isolated breakthroughs, AI systems are beginning to execute entire workflows”

The formalization produced 13 million lines of Lean code and 29,500 intermediate theorems.

Grok

“The effort produced 13 million lines of Lean code and proved 29 500 intermediate theorems”

How to verify: Check the original Anthropic report and repository for the precise line count, theorem count, and whether the formalization was end-to-end and autonomously generated.