The answer, statement by statement
What the answer is made of
The models do not agree here
2Still in the answer, stated differently by different models. Open a row to read each position and who holds it.
Split
AlphaProof/AlphaGeometry system reached silver-medal level on IMO 2024 problems
1/3
AlphaProof/AlphaGeometry system reached silver-medal level on IMO 2024 problems
- Grok
solving static, high-school-level competition problems (such as the International Mathematical Olympiad)
- Gemini
evidence has moved beyond “AI can solve olympiad exercises”
- OpenAI
Split
disproved a conjecture in discrete geometry related to the Erdős unit-distance problem
1/3
disproved a conjecture in discrete geometry related to the Erdős unit-distance problem
- OpenAI
- Grok
an 80-year-old open problem related to the Erdős unit distance conjecture
- Gemini
Restated check after check
2The load-bearing part of this answer. The longest unbroken run on this Topic stands at 1 check.
Settled
AI has definitely advanced previously unsolved mathematics
1/3
Settled
DeepMind’s FunSearch, which found new constructions for the cap set problem
1/3
Read the full answer Check 3 of 19 · 2026-07-29 · 3 models +
What the models said then
minorThe consensus updated specific examples and categorization of AI's mathematical achievements. While the old consensus leaned heavily on an internal OpenAI discrete geometry result and Lean-verified Erdős problems, the new consensus emphasizes DeepMind's FunSearch and AlphaEvolve alongside the Erdős unit-distance counterexample. The core conclusion—that AI has made material research-level advances
The current evidence is that AI has definitely advanced previously unsolved mathematics, and in a few cases has appeared to resolve or overturn longstanding conjectures—but the strongest results are still limited to problems where outputs can be externally checked, formally verified, or digested by mathematicians.
What is clearly established
1) AI has produced new results on open problems
A major example is DeepMind’s FunSearch, which found new constructions for the cap set problem and improved known lower bounds rather than merely reproducing existing answers.openaiopenai This is real mathematical progress on a long-open problem, even though it does not fully solve the problem.
2) AI has improved bounds and constructions across several research-level problems
DeepMind’s later AlphaEvolve work reports improvements on a range of mathematical and algorithmic tasks, including the 11-dimensional kissing number and other open problems, with a public repository of problems and verification materials.githubarxivdeepmind These are material advances, but mostly in the form of better constructions, tighter bounds, or rediscovered known optima—not full resolutions of major open conjectures.
3) AI can solve very hard formalized problems
DeepMind’s AlphaProof/AlphaGeometry system reached silver-medal level on IMO 2024 problems, showing strong formal reasoning and proof search.ieee That is impressive evidence of mathematical competence, but IMO problems are not the same as unresolved research conjectures.
The strongest “AI solved an open problem” case so far
The most prominent recent example is OpenAI’s public announcement that an internal model disproved a conjecture in discrete geometry related to the Erdős unit-distance problem.research OpenAI released a proof manuscript and companion remarks from mathematicians, which is unusually strong evidence for a genuine new result.deepmind The important nuance is that this is best described as disproving a longstanding conjectured upper bound, not fully solving every aspect of the unit-distance problem.
That makes it the clearest public case that AI has moved beyond toy or competition settings into research-level discovery.
What has not been shown
Despite these advances, there is no solid evidence that AI has resolved the major remaining Millennium Prize problems or become a generally reliable autonomous mathematician. Current systems still struggle with:
- deciding whether a problem is truly open,
- avoiding plausible but invalid proofs,
- choosing fruitful abstractions,
- and producing results that stand up without substantial human checking.
Bottom line
The best-supported conclusion is:
AI has materially advanced several previously unsolved mathematical problems and has at least one strong public case of disproving a longstanding open conjecture, but it has not broadly solved major open mathematics in the way humans would usually mean by “solved.”
If you want, I can also give you a short timeline of the key breakthroughs or a table separating “competition success,” “new bounds,” and “genuine open-problem advances.”
Where this comes from 41 sources in this check · 92 dated across the record · 34 new +
Best available sources
Show 36 more sources
Sources that left the record (51)
A source dropping out is part of the record too: it carried an earlier version of this answer and is not part of the current one. The models re-run their own web search on every check, so single links come and go. The 8 most recently dropped are shown here, dated to their last appearance.
Every position, model by model Direction Shift — · Not comparable +
Where the models actually split
Each question keeps its own dimensions. Ask one model and you get one of these positions with no sign that the others exist.
AI has definitely advanced previously unsolved mathematics
Supported by
- Gemini
- OpenAI
- Grok
disproved a conjecture in discrete geometry related to the Erdős unit-distance problem
Supported by
- OpenAI
- Grok
an 80-year-old open problem related to the Erdős unit distance conjecture
- Gemini
AlphaProof/AlphaGeometry system reached silver-medal level on IMO 2024 problems
Supported by
- Grok
solving static, high-school-level competition problems (such as the International Mathematical Olympiad)
- Gemini
evidence has moved beyond “AI can solve olympiad exercises”
- OpenAI
DeepMind’s FunSearch, which found new constructions for the cap set problem
Supported by
- Grok
| Model | Jul 25 | Jul 27 | Jul 29 |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | |||
| Gemini | |||
| Grok |
The record behind this page 3 checks kept in full · no material change yet +
The record
Unchanged through 2 checks, 4 days.No material change since the first check on Jul 25, 2026. 3 checks kept in full, 92 sources dated.
How this answer held up
50/100 agreement at this checkThe same question, re-asked 3 times. The score moves between a small set of grading levels, so read the steps as levels, not as measurements.
No check in this window was graded a material change. The steps in the curve are wording-level differences between two answers that say the same thing.